Diabetes Professional Resources Online  /  American Diabetes Association
Home About Us Donate Now Join ADA
DiabetesPro Home
Meetings and Continuing Education Opportunities
Scientific Sessions Webcasts
Resources for Professionals
Clinical Practice
Recommendations
Professional Membership
Journals
Books for Professionals
Research Grant Applications and Administration
About Diabetes Research
Recognition Programs
Professional Section
Interest Groups
Professional Section
Quarterly
Point of Care
Thomson Reuters - Prous Science
 
Print this page Email this article
Click on - or + to modify the size of the text on this page. Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size

Click to add/remove this article to your list of 'My Favorites'
Excessive loss of skeletal muscle mass in the elderly associated with type 2 diabetes

January - 7 - 2010 

Findings from the Health, Aging and Body Composition study, conducted in well-functioning, community-dwelling older adults aged 70-79 years, have revealed the influence of type 2 diabetes on skeletal muscle mass. Using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, researchers examined body composition in a sample of 2,675 older adults over a 6-year period. Annual decline in total body mass was significantly higher in persons with undiagnosed or diagnosed diabetes than in those without diabetes (-435 vs -293 vs -193 g/year, respectively, P < 0.01)after adjusting for age, race, sex, clinic site, body mass index and weight loss intention. Total lean mass, particularly in the extremities (appendicular lean mass) mostly contributed to total body mass decrease. Diabetes, either diagnosed or undiagnosed, was also associated with a marked reduction in total fat mass, especially trunk fat mass, while it was unchanged in nondiabetic individuals. Declines in thigh muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) were generally more profound in men than women regardless of their glycemic status. However, women with diabetes (diagnosed or undiagnosed) exhibited a 2-fold greater loss of thigh muscle CSA than nondiabetic women (-11.1 vs. -11.7 vs. -5.1 cm2, P < 0.001), even when adjusting for differences in body size, weight changes and inflammatory cytokines (Park, S.W. et al. Diabetes Care 2009, 32(11): 1993).